Russia's Military After Ukraine

Potential Pathways for the Postwar Reconstitution of the Russian Armed Forces

Michelle Grisé, Mark Cozad, Anna M. Dowd, Mark Hvizda, John Kennedy, Marta Kepe, Clara de Lataillade, Krystyna Marcinek, David Woodworth

ResearchPublished Jan 16, 2025

As of the writing of this report, the ultimate resolution of the Russia-Ukraine war is likely far off. Many questions remain, such as how the conflict will ultimately end, what the status of Russian and Ukrainian forces will be at the conclusion, and the lessons that Russia, Ukraine, and the West will learn from the years of fighting. What is clear, however, is that afterward, Russia will face the challenges of regenerating specific capabilities and systems and rethinking the role of its armed forces in countering perceived threats and achieving its strategic objectives.

In this report, the authors examine how reconstitution efforts might be shaped by (1) historical Russian defense reforms, (2) the Russian armed forces' performance in the Ukraine conflict, and (3) political, economic, demographic, technical, and foreign relations factors. They analyze Russian official statements and military scholarship on reconstitution and incorporate findings from discussions with experts on Russia and government advisers in Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, and Sweden.

From this analysis, the authors developed four potential reconstitution pathways: The Shoigu Plan, which reflects thinking on reconstitution that was proposed by Russia's former Minister of Defense; Revisiting Old Models, which would be a return to an emphasis on mass and a heavy reliance on conscription, mobilization, nuclear capabilities, and domestic production; A New, New Look, which would entail the rebuilding of a smaller, yet qualitatively superior, force; and A New Operational Model, which would involve major institutional reforms.

Key Findings

  • The way in which the Ukraine war ends will inform the lessons that Russia learns from the conflict and, by extension, the decisions that Russia makes about the reconstitution of its armed forces.
  • Russia's relationships with its key partners—including, notably, China, Iran, Belarus, and North Korea—will play an especially influential role in shaping the reconstitution process.
  • Russia's decision to restructure the country's economy for wartime has created dependencies within the defense industrial base that will be difficult to reverse.
  • Although U.S. allies are closely tracking Russia's reconstitution efforts, their focus is on the speed of reconstitution rather than the nature of the reconstituted Russian military.
  • A partially reconstituted Russian military will still pose a significant threat to U.S. and Western interests in the European theater.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
262 pages
List Price
$49.95
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2024
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 262
  • Paperback Price: $49.95
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 1-9774-1415-X
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2713-1
  • Document Number: RR-A2713-1

Citation

RAND Style Manual

Grisé, Michelle, Mark Cozad, Anna M. Dowd, Mark Hvizda, John Kennedy, Marta Kepe, Clara de Lataillade, Krystyna Marcinek, and David Woodworth, Russia's Military After Ukraine: Potential Pathways for the Postwar Reconstitution of the Russian Armed Forces, RAND Corporation, RR-A2713-1, 2024. As of April 30, 2025: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2713-1.html

Chicago Manual of Style

Grisé, Michelle, Mark Cozad, Anna M. Dowd, Mark Hvizda, John Kennedy, Marta Kepe, Clara de Lataillade, Krystyna Marcinek, and David Woodworth, Russia's Military After Ukraine: Potential Pathways for the Postwar Reconstitution of the Russian Armed Forces. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2713-1.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This research was sponsored by the Russia Strategic Initiative, U.S. European Command, and conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Program of the RAND National Security Research Division.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.